Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help Editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here.
Pastoralism operates a double-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous. The benefit of double-blind peer review is that it allows reviewers to judge the manuscript based on content alone, and they are not unconsciously biased by knowledge of who the authors are.
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. Reviewers will also be asked to indicate how interesting and significant the research is. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.
2017 Journal Metrics
72.6 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
51.2 days to first decision for all manuscripts
106.9 days from submission to acceptance
63.8 days from acceptance to publication
108 altmetric mentions
All articles published in Pastoralism are listed in the following indexing services:
- CAB Abstracts
- CAB International
- Global Health
- Summon by Proquest
- ISSN: 2041-7136