Cashmere production, harvesting, marketing and processing by nomads of Iran - A review
© Ansari-Renani. 2015
Received: 10 May 2015
Accepted: 21 September 2015
Published: 9 November 2015
Iran together with Afghanistan is the third largest producer and exporter of cashmere in the world, after China and Mongolia. Nomads have a big share in producing Iranian cashmere. This study reviews the status of cashmere production, harvesting, marketing and processing by nomads of Iran in order to evaluate sustainability and to identify some constraints limiting productivity. The quality of Iranian cashmere, being long and highly curved, ranks third after China and Mongolia. The principal centres for the gathering and rough sorting of raw cashmere produced by nomads are Baft, Sirjan, Mashad and Birjand, with Mashad continuing as the centre of the Iranian cashmere industry. Nearly all the cashmere produced is bought directly from the nomads by middlemen and is dehaired and exported to Europe and China without major value addition.
Of the 25 million goats in Iran, 5 million are cashmere-producing and the remaining goats are meat and milk types (Ansari-Renani et al. 2013a; Ansari-Renani 2004). Nomads (ashayer) keep 40 % of all goats in habitats covering about 59 % of the country. Nomads keep goats mainly for selling live animals to local markets and for home consumption of meat, but cashmere is also a major source of income for Raeini, Birjandi, Nadushan, Abadeh and Abasabadi goat breed keepers. The major portion of Iranian cashmere is produced by Raeini goats kept by nomads in Kerman Province (Ansari-Renani et al. 2012, 2013a).
The most important determinants of animal fibre quality are the species that produce it and the diameter of the fibre, as previously described for Iranian cashmere (Ansari-Renani et al. 2011a, b; Ansari-Renani 2012). The fleece of cashmere goats are double coated and consist of two major fibre types: coarse, medullated guard hair and fine, non-medullated insulative down fibre (Allain 1992; Mitchell et al. 1991; Nixon et al. 1991; Ryder 1966; Carter and Clark 1943; Petrie 1995). In early spring, as a result of inactivity of secondary follicles, Iranian cashmere goats start a sequential, bilaterally symmetric pattern of shedding their fine undercoat fibres, commencing on the neck, chest and shoulders and spreading to the back and rump (Ansari-Renani 2001).
The quality of Iranian cashmere being long and highly curved (Ansari-Renani et al. 2012, 2013a; McGregor and Postle 2004; McGregor 2007) ranks third in price after China and Mongolia (Schneider 2012). At present, no price differential is paid to nomads for producing fine cashmere, and the producers are not aware of world market prices for different cashmere quality classes (Ansari-Renani et. al. 2013). Almost all cashmere is exported without any added value through processing. As a result of the marketing system, producers do not achieve good prices and have little incentive to produce better quality cashmere. This study reviews the present status of Iranian nomad cashmere goat production, harvesting, marketing and processing and the potential for improving cashmere industry.
In-depth open interviews and group discussions were used for acquiring qualitative data. Interviews and discussions were conducted from August to December 2011, mainly in the eastern regions with key cashmere industry actors in Iran: producers, buyers and processors of cashmere. Three different structured questionnaires for producers, buyers and processors were completed, to compile information regarding quality and quantity of cashmere, selling season/month, factors important to making decisions on cashmere prices, means of transport, kinds of payment, types of agreement with buyer/seller, market accessibility, type of sorting/storage, packaging, processing machines: scouring, garneting, dehairing, combing, challenges, education, training and customs.
Seven short periods of field work were conducted to interview 40 cashmere farmers in each of the Baft and Birjand regions in Kerman and South Khorasan provinces respectively. Three short periods of field work in December 2011 were also conducted to interview 15 middlemen in the main marketing cities of Kerman, Sirjan, Birjand and Mashad. Fieldwork was also conducted to interview the owners of cashmere mills in Semnan and Mashad Provinces.
Information on prices and marketing margins
Price information along the value chain was obtained from the different sources (actors) along the value chain, and cross-checked with each other. Prices for raw cashmere were obtained from nomads, district, provincial and national level assemblers and the exporters, while margins were calculated accordingly. Export prices for raw and dehaired cashmere were obtained from processors and exporters. Wholesale and final garment prices were obtained from different websites. The volume of marketed cashmere and corresponding number of goats was mainly derived from available literature, the national census and official statistics.
Cashmere goat breeds
Nomads play an important role in the country’s goat production, mainly because they keep 40 % of Iran’s goat population. Approximately 70 % of goats in Iran are of mixed breeds and their crosses, which are mainly kept for meat production, while other types are known for their cashmere (Raeini, Birjandi, Abadeh and Nadoushan), mohair (Markhoz), milk (Najdi) and meat (Tali, Adani and Native black) production (Ansari-Renani et al. 2012, 2013a).
The major portion of Iranian cashmere is produced in the eastern part of the country, mainly by two breeds of goat: Raeini and Birjandi (Baluchi) in Kerman and South Khorasan Provinces, respectively. However, Raeini goats, which are mainly kept by nomads, are the most important cashmere-producing breed in terms of population and thus the volume of cashmere produced.
Combing goats to avoid cashmere loss
In parts of Iran, cashmere is harvested during the three- to six-week spring period when the goats are moulting or by collecting the moulted fibres from the ground and bushes (Ansari-Renani et al. 2012, 2013a; Ansari-Renani 2013). Cashmere is harvested by nomads using combs at the beginning of spring in the south-eastern provinces of South Khorasan, Khorasan Razavi and parts of Sistan and Baluchistan. In the main cashmere-producing province of Kerman, cashmere is shorn by nomads in different months of spring using double-blade scissors called docard. In a study with 30 nomad settlements chosen at random within ±20 km of Baft city in Kerman Province, it was revealed that 52 % and 30 % of nomads sheared their goats in May and April while 11 % and 7 % do so in March and June, respectively (Ansari-Renani et al. 2013b). In early spring (March), cashmere goats start a sequential, bilaterally symmetric pattern of shedding their fine undercoat fibres commencing on the neck, chest and shoulders then spreading to the back and rump. Shed fibres remain some time entangled in the rest of the fleece but eventually fall off the animal.
Cashmere shedding and time of fibre harvesting in nomadic areas
In terms of harvesting maximum weight of fibre, the optimal time for a single shearing would be at the end of winter season in January or early February at the peak of follicle inactivity or before onset of shedding. At the time of cashmere harvesting, animals are in their poorest body conditions after the cold weather and very limited feed availability (Ansari-Renani et al. 2013c). It is important from the point of animal welfare that some hair is left on the skin after fleece harvesting as this hair provides an essential protective layer (McGregor 1988) against adverse weather conditions. Use of shearing methods, either machine or hand shearing which removes the entire fleece, poses a serious threat and is inconceivable under such conditions. In addition, the presence of unshed long coarse guard hair in the fleece helps fibre loss once shedding has begun by acting as a physical barrier restraining the cashmere in its position (McGregor 1988). This allows owners to time their fibre harvesting, either using combs or by collecting the clumps of hair retained in the fleece. Use of combs reduces further fibre loss during the shedding season.
Cashmere-producing areas included in the marketing study
The nomadic pastoralists who produce cashmere in Iran are differentiated by herd size, income levels and grazing management. About half of nomad households in Baft area own 200 to 300 Raeini goats, with 23 % and 30 % of families owning less than 200 and more than 300 goats, respectively (Ansari-Renani et al. 2013b). Livestock is their largest asset and predominates as a source of livelihood and supply of food. The nomadic pastoralist system here, as elsewhere, is characterized by low population density, self-reliance for basic needs, movement of livestock between grazing sites in different seasons and weak linkages to markets and public services. Rangeland is considered as the main source of grazing and depends on seasonal rainfall. In the previous decades, these households have been able to operate at the margin only due to the implicit cost-free public land and water and restocking of goats after livestock numbers are devastated in harsh winters and drought seasons.
Nomad cashmere producers
A competitive advantage for the cashmere industry in east Iran is its access to raw cashmere, which is produced by low-income nomad herders in eastern Iran and bordering Afghanistan. There is a large seasonal variation of supply, demand and price of cashmere. Cashmere harvesting and buying takes place over a short spring period in nomadic areas. In-depth open interviews and group discussions conducted in the eastern regions with key industry actors revealed that 80 % of cashmere is sold to dealers from April to June and 20 % of the remaining is sold in July. While 62 % of nomads sell their cashmere in one period of time, 22 %, 11 % and 5 % sell their harvested cashmere at two, three and four different intervals, respectively (Ansari-Renani et al. 2013b). All nomad goat owners sold the whole fibre, undehaired, containing both rough outer hair and the inner fine cashmere, to local or travelling merchants or traders. The raw cashmere is unsorted and sold at lower prices than could be expected if the cashmere was sorted at source into quality classes.
Results from previous studies indicate that 30 % of cashmere is lost during shedding season and if not harvested would be wasted (Ansari-Renani et al. 2011a).
Nomad cashmere producers do not receive seasonal price information on cashmere through reliable and up-to-date sources. Results indicated that 41 % and 32 % of nomads receive scattered marketing information from traders or neighbouring farms, respectively, while 14 % and 13 % received their information from associations and markets, respectively (Ansari-Renani et al. 2013b).
Nomads market their cashmere on an ‘eye-ball’ basis: transactions are made between individuals and agreements reached after one-to-one bargaining between buyers and sellers. The reason for ‘eye-ball’ marketing is the lack of infrastructure for measurements of the cashmere.
There have been some changes in marketing from time to time and in various parts of the country, but in general no drastic changes for some years. Perhaps the biggest change has been the general trade practice whereby most of the warehousing of cashmere is done near the source of supply. Another change has been the increase in direct buying from nomads by processors or manufacturers. According to the interviewed nomad cashmere producers, the local buyers collect cashmere and either sell to a merchant in town or store in their own facility. Most dealing of this kind is with nomads having a limited number of goats.
The nomads stress the fact that life in the nomadic region has become very hard due to the economic situation. Nomads noted that their livestock do not produce enough milk, cashmere and meat to sustain them throughout the year. Thus, the nomads have to consume a larger part of the yield of their capital (livestock) than they would otherwise have done. This can have dire consequences, since they constantly are under threat of losing part of their flocks due to environmental factors, and smaller flock sizes make it more difficult to survive a disaster by recovering flock sizes during good years.
The nomadic pastoralists are declining in number and resort to all means of occupation, exacerbated due to efforts of the governments to sedentarize them as well as due to severe environmental conditions such as droughts which force the nomads to search for wages in urban areas.
The important agencies involved in getting the cashmere from the nomad cashmere producers to the manufacturers are the country buyer, the country assembler or cashmere-warehouse handler or dealer or combination, local cashmere pools, the commission merchant and the broker.
Cashmere pools have operated for years and are becoming more numerous in the eastern cashmere-producing provinces. These pools are usually made up of many growers’ clips in a nearby locality, which pool their cashmere in one central location and have buyers come and make a price offer. Sometimes the cashmere may be sorted, but more often they are not.
In nomadic areas, a cashmere buyer may be a local man living in the rangeland all year round, or he may be a man sent directly from the country buyer. Some large purchasers of cashmere during the last several years have set up permanent buying organizations at central locations in the nomadic areas of eastern cashmere-growing regions. Thus, the buyers are closer to the source of cashmere and effect a saving here and also through direct shipments to mills. Local buyers generally work on commission; this is based on the amount of cashmere purchased, whereas some buyers are normally paid a salary and their travelling expenses. Some eastern cashmere middlemen have purchasing orders from different merchants or mills for specified quantities of various types of cashmere. This is done especially by lager mills, who desire to purchase in advance cashmere suitable for their sales requirements, and in such cases, the buyer works on a commission.
Cashmere producers in the nomadic areas sell unsorted raw cashmere at lower prices than could be expected if the cashmere was sorted at source into quality classes. Nomad cashmere producers do not receive seasonal price information on cashmere through reliable and up-to-date sources.
After harvesting, cashmere is bought directly from the nomads by middlemen and the fibre is stored in warehouses, according to colour and fineness. A basic problem that operators of cashmere warehouses have in some years, especially during drought, is to obtain adequate volumes of cashmere for efficient handling. This involves consideration of the sources and availability of potential supplies, the competition from others, as well as transportation facilities and costs. With sufficient volumes of cashmere available, other problems include securing at reasonable costs adequate protection from losses by fire and other hazards, obtaining and maintaining suitable facilities and equipment for efficient rendering of essential warehouse and related services, securing adequate information concerning the quality and commercial value of the cashmere handled, and maintaining suitable contacts with market outlets to dispose of the cashmere qualities handled.
Raw sorted cashmere from gathering centres is sent in bales by trucks or by train to Bandar Abbas and Khoramshahr, the main Iranian exporting ports in the Persian Gulf. From these ports, baled raw cashmere is shipped to Italy, Belgium and England. However, about one third of raw Iranian cashmere stock goes to Semnan and Mashad for processing. Processed cashmere also finds its way to the same Persian Gulf ports to be exported to other countries.
Cashmere mills and export market
China is not only a heavy producer but also a major importer of Iranian raw cashmere. China also imports significant volumes of cashmere in other various forms. Access to imported cashmere provides another important source of competitive advantage to Chinese processors, especially as the trade partners are located in the relatively nearby regions of Pakistan, Afghanistan and especially Mongolia.
Afghan cashmere has traditionally been exported to Iran for early-stage processing and then exported for final processing (De Weijer 2008). However, with decreased purchases from Europe after the 2008 global financial crisis, Chinese buyers have become very active in Afghanistan (Cashmere Fibres International 2009).
Iranian traders play an important role in the export of Afghanistan raw and dehaired cashmere to Belgium for disinfection, which may explain why most of the cashmere production and trading is still taking place in the northwest west of Afghanistan (Altai Consulting Ltd 2005) close to Mashad city in Iran (Figure 2). Verviers, in Belgium, used to be the main market centre for cashmere, as it was suited in the core of the textile centre in Europe. Nowadays, the role of Verviers as the main market place has diminished, but for Afghan cashmere, Verviers is still a major destination through Iran.
Cashmere from Afghanistan is being processed in Mashad scouring and dehairing facilities and then transported to Europe through Iran. Iranian processors have established relations with certain Herati exporters in Afghanistan, who supply these dehairing facilities.
Cashmere prices and valued addition along the marketing chain
Pastoral and semi-pastoral regions of Iran produce almost 75 % of all Iran’s cashmere. Only one fifth of the Iranian goat population is cashmere-producing; however, based on household surveys and interviews conducted, there is indication that households have clear incentives to switch from the production of hairy goats to cashmere goats and, of the cashmere goat breeds available, maximize profits by selecting Raeini and Birjandi breeds of goats over the hairy-type (scrub) goats which have a population of more than 18 million head. This population of hairy goats also have an undercoat of downy fibre that is classed as ‘cashmere’. While only a very small quantity of this down is produced per animal, it can be worthwhile for farmers or traders to comb or fellmonger (removing fibre from the surface of the skin using hair-removing chemical agents) the down from skins, especially when prices are high. This cashmere can be used to produce low-value products and for blending to produce ‘cashmere’ products. If no price-grade differentials are paid for the cashmere - as is the case under the current Iranian marketing system - then due to their higher cashmere yields, Raeini cashmere breeds of goats are more profitable than hairy goats.
Production of cashmere in Iran takes place in selected provinces. At the lowest section of the value addition chain, considerable potential exists to expand production of cashmere to goat farms in other provinces.
Such expansions should be done with care over time, as ‘quick fixes’ such as crossing with very high producing exotic goats tend to decrease fibre diameter rapidly by reducing staple length and fibre curvature creating short, flat fibre. The way to restore the quality of Iranian cashmere is through herd selection and superior genetics. There is scope within the national herd to increase fibre yield without reducing fibre quality and thus increasing financial returns to farmers.
Higher export earnings from cashmere could help to boost the income of a large number of Iranian cashmere nomad herders, if more of the value was passed on to the producers, many of whom represent the poorest segments of Iranian society. There are ambiguities, however, about the sustainability of cashmere production as a livelihood for nomad and smallholder households.
Value addition takes place at different stages of the production and market chain. Most of the power within the value chain resides with the privately owned processing firms and retailers; herders are the largest group of actors but perhaps the least powerful. Lack of market information makes herders vulnerable to exploitation by processors and traders, and without price differentials between high-quality cashmere and other grades, herders lack incentives to invest in improving their herds. In another study with cashmere goats in the Pamir mountain districts of Tajikistan, McGregor et al. (2011) indicated that villagers need objective and up-to-date information on commercial prices for better quality cashmere, to motivate them to select finer bucks.
A producer training programme on combing cashmere would add the commercial value of their cashmere. Commercially recoverable cashmere yields are higher from combed rather than shorn fleeces, making combed cashmere more attractive to textile processors. Very low yielding fleeces need extra dehairing and have a higher residue of coarse fibres left after dehairing. The extra processing also tends to cause more fibre breakage, leading to lower final product prices and less added commercial value as a result of shorter fibre length and hence lower yarn quality.
Dusting or opening
Blending or mixing
Oiling the stock
Cashmere stock must be lubricated to minimize breakage of the cashmere fibres in opening processes such carding, as well as to reduce fly, waste and static electricity in carding.
Carding constitutes the last operation in which the cashmere fibres can be properly opened.
Essentially, vacuum pressing is the common method in the Mashad processing mill; the method is to fill a flexible airtight container such as a polythene bag with the desired weight of cashmere and then to evacuate the air.
Iranian nomads are not aware of world market prices for different cashmere quality classes. As a result of the marketing system, nomads do not achieve good prices and have little incentive to produce better quality cashmere. Poor marketing infrastructure, lack of access to formal credit sources and lack of standardization and grading are major constraints affecting the value addition of cashmere marketing. All Iranian cashmere is exported without major value addition. To achieve more value addition, attention must be given to improvement in market information and intelligence and formulation of new marketing and processing policies.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Allain, D. 1992. Biology and characteristics of goat fibers. In New developments in goat husbandry for quality production. Seminar proceeding held at Lisbon, Portugal. 27–29 October, 1992, ed. H Galbraith, 22–35.Google Scholar
- Altai Consulting Ltd. 2005. Market Sector Association – SME development, Chapter V, “Cashmere”. Altai Consulting, for UNDP KabulGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR. 2001. Seasonal follicle cycle and fibre shedding of Raein cashmere goats. J. Pajou. and Sazan. Ministry Agriculture, Iran 14(4): 23–25.Google Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR. 2004. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of Iranian cashmere and mohair producing goats. Proceeding of first animal and fisheries congress, 867–871. Iran: Tehran University.Google Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR. 2012. Fiber quality of Iranian carpet-wool sheep breeds. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 35(3): 179–184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR. 2013. Cashmere quality of Iranian goat breeds. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 35(3): 179–184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR, M Salehi, Z Ebadi, S Moradi, HR Baghershah, Ansari –Renani MY, and SH Ameli. 2011a. Determination of hair follicle characteristics, density and activity of Iranian cashmere goat breeds. Small Ruminant Research 95: 128–132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR, S Moradi, HR Baghershah, Z Ebadi, M Salehi, SM Seyed Momen, and MY Ansari-Renani. 2011b. Determination of wool follicle characteristics of Iranian sheep breeds. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24(8): 1173–1177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR, JP Mueller, B Rischkowsky, SM Seyed Momen, O Alipour, M Ehsani, and S Moradi. 2012. Cashmere quality of Raeini goats kept by nomads in Iran. Small Ruminant Research 104: 10–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR, JP Mueller, B Rischkowsky, and S Moradi. 2013a. Cashmere in Iran. ICARDA-ASRI, 4–5Google Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR, JP Mueller, B Rischkowsky, SM Seyed Momen, and S Moradi. 2013b. Nomadic pastoralism in southern Iran. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 3: 11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari-Renani, HR, JP Mueller, B Rischkowsky, SM Seyed Momen, M Ehsani, S Moradi, et al. 2013c. Observations on the efficiency of using different cashmere combs. Small Ruminant Research 114: 220–224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carter, HB, and WH Clark. 1943. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 91–108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cashmere Fibres International. 2009. Market report - November, 2009.Google Scholar
- De Weijer, F. 2008. Cashmere value chain analyses Afghanistan, 38. USAID: Accelerating Sustainable Agriculture Program.Google Scholar
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2014. www.FAOSTAT.com.
- McGregor, BA. 1988. Production of cashmere in northern China. Study tour report No. 134. Victoria: Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
- McGregor, BA. 2007. Cashmere fibre crimp, crimp form and fibre curvature. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 55(1): 8.Google Scholar
- McGregor, BA, and R Postle. 2004. Softness and other fibre attributes of commercial cashmere textiles from China and other origins of production. In Proceedings of the Textile Institute 83rd World Conference, May 23–27, Shanghai, 372–375.Google Scholar
- McGregor, BA, C Kerven, and S Toigonbaev. 2011. Sources of variation affecting cashmere grown in the Pamir mountain districts of Tajikistan and implications for industry development. Small Ruminant Research 99: 7–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell, RJ, K Betteridge, MP Gurnsey, RAS Welch, and AJ Nixon. 1991. Fibre growth cycles of cashmere-bearing reproducing does in Southern Hawkes Bay, New Zealand, over 30 month period. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 287–294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nixon, AJ, MP Gurnsey, K Betteridge, RJ Mitchell, and RAS Welch. 1991. Seasonal hair follicle activity and fiber growth in some New Zealand cashmere-bearing goats (Capra hircus). Journal of Zoology (London) 224: 589–598.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petrie, OJ. 1995. Harvesting of textile animal fibers. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. No. 22.Google Scholar
- Ryder, ML. 1966. Coat structure and seasonal shedding in goats. Animal Production 8: 289–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider, GS. 2012. Market indicators. http://www.gschneider.com/indicators/index.php.Google Scholar