Skip to main content

Research, Policy and Practice

Table 5 Satisfaction level on PRM process, decision and interventions

From: Participatory rangeland management: A vehicle for pastoralist women’s empowerment in Ethiopia

Zone

Level of satisfaction

What is your level of satisfaction with how the governing body/organisation of the PRM was established?, number (%)

What is your level of satisfaction with the PRM planning processes?, number (%)

What is your level of satisfaction with the whole PRM intervention?, number (%)

Men

Women

Total

Men

Women

Total

Men

Women

Total

Bale, Oromia

Very satisfied

22 (29.7)

5 (38.5)

27 (31.0)

33 (44.6)

5 (38.5)

38 (43.7)

31 (41.9)

4 (30.8)

35 (40.5)

Satisfied

48 (64.9)

8 (61.5)

56 (64.4)

40 (54.1)

7 (53.8)

47 (54)

41 (55.4)

9 (69.2)

50 (57.5)

Unsatisfied

3 (4.1)

0 (0)

3 (3.4)

1 (1.4)

1 (7.7)

2 (2.3)

2 (2.7)

0 (0)

2 (2.3)

Not satisfied at all

1 (1.4)

0 (0)

1 (1.1)

Borena/Guji, Oromia

Very satisfied

1 (8.3)

1 (50)

2 (14.3)

2 (16.7)

0 (0)

2 (14.3)

Satisfied

11 (91.7)

1 (50)

12 (85.7)

10 (83.3)

2 (100)

12 (85.7)

12 (100)

2 (100)

14 (100)

Afar Zone 3

Very satisfied

6 (11.5)

1 (5)

7 (9.7)

1 (1.9)

2 (10)

3 (4.2)

8 (15.4)

1 (5)

9 (12.5)

Satisfied

37 (71.2)

16 (80)

53 (73.6)

44 (84.6)

17 (85)

61 (84.7)

32 (61.5)

16 (80)

48 (66.7)

Unsatisfied

8 (15.4)

3 (15)

11 (15.3)

6 (11.5)

1 (5)

7 (9.7)

9 (17.3)

0 (0)

9 (12.5)

Not satisfied at all

1 (1.9)

0 (0)

1 (1.4)

1 (1.9)

0 (0)

1 (1.4)

3 (5.8)

3 (15)

6 (8.3)