Skip to main content

Research, Policy and Practice

Table 3 Attitude of local respondent farmers on grassland management in Madi valley of Chitwan, Nepal

From: Farmers' perceptions of grassland management in Magui Khola basin of Madi Chitwan, Nepal

Attributes

Bankatta

Khairahani

LR

CC

Chi.sq

Significance

Social conflict

 Yes

25 (32.1)

21 (26.9)

0357

0.104

.848

p = 0.357

 No

14 (17.9)

18 (23.1)

   

Detrimental animal species

 Buffalo

16 (20.5)

18 (23.1)

0.209

0.052

0.209

p = 0.048

 Goat

23 (29.5)

21 (26.9)

   

Herbage composition change after flooding

 Yes

21 (26.9)

30 (38.5)

0.236

4.66

4.59

p = 0.032

 No

18 (23.1)

9 (11.5)

   

Dominant mixtures mosaics

 Imperata-S. spontaneum

36 (46.2)

25 (32.1)

0.718

0.323

9.101

p < .003

 Imperata-S. spontaneum-S. benghalense

3 (3.8)

14 (17.9)

   

 Herbage recovery period (years)*

2.69

2.62

-

  

p = 0.482

Herbage similarities in newly formed pasture after flooding damage

 Yes

18 (23.1)

29 (37.2)

6.588

0.277

6.478,

p = 0.011

 No

21(26.9)

10 (12.8)

   

Main areas of riverine grassland conservation and management

 Fodder cropping

11(14.1)

21(26.9)

0.118

0.315

8.576

p < 0.014

 Plantation trees

10 (12.8)

2 (2.6)

   

 River belt construction

18 (23.1)

16 (20.5)

   
  1. LR likelihood ratio, CC contingency coefficient, values in the parentheses indicated percentage respondents, Chi-sq Pearson chi-square coefficient
  2. *Mean analysed by one-way ANOVA, standard deviation = 0.479