Research, Policy and Practice
From: Characterisation of smallholders’ goat production systems in the Fatick area, Senegal
Variables and categories | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Total | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational level | *** | ||||
Literacy education | 21 | 0 | 10 | 31 | |
Primary education | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | |
Secondary education | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
Quranic education | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
Buck breed | NS | ||||
Local breed mating | 27 | 3 | 13 | 43 | |
Crossbreeding | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Grazing mode | NS | ||||
Mixed crop-livestock system | 27 | 4 | 11 | 42 | |
Free grazing | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
Animal housing | NS | ||||
Unsheltered | 25 | 2 | 11 | 38 | |
Sheltered | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Milk process | *** | ||||
No milk processing | 1 | 1 | 13 | 15 | |
Milk curdling | 26 | 1 | 0 | 27 | |
Cheese and yoghurt processing | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
Milking | *** | ||||
No milking | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 | |
Milking | 28 | 3 | 0 | 31 | |
Motivation of keeping goat | *** | ||||
Cash income and self-consumption | 0 | 1 | 12 | 13 | |
Milk | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
Cash income and self-consumption and milking | 25 | 2 | 1 | 28 | |
Birth size | NS | ||||
Single births | 7 | 0 | 2 | 9 | |
Twin births | 21 | 4 | 11 | 36 | |
Common diseases | * | ||||
Respiratory disease | 19 | 1 | 6 | 26 | |
Digestive disease | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
Dermatosis disease | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
Parasitosis disease | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Bovine | NS | ||||
No bovine keeping | 22 | 3 | 11 | 36 | |
Bovine keeping | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
Sheep | NS | ||||
No sheep keeping | 12 | 0 | 7 | 19 | |
Sheep keeping | 16 | 4 | 6 | 26 | |
Household size | NS | ||||
Small household, 1 to 5 members | 12 | 1 | 4 | 17 | |
Medium household, 6 to 10 members | 14 | 2 | 7 | 23 | |
Large household, > 10 members | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |