Skip to main content

Research, Policy and Practice

Table 1 Summary of research methods

From: Managing livelihood risks: Income diversification and the livelihood strategies of households in pastoral settlements in Isiolo County, Kenya

Method

Sample size

Approach

Purpose

Household survey

260 respondents split among the three study pastoral settlement sites

Random sampling from the village household roster obtained from the village chiefs

The household survey (n = 260) was conducted with households in the three selected pastoral settlements and was intended to help discern a range of issues pertaining to general household demographic data and household livelihood information including livelihood and income activities; livestock strategies, risks and social exchange networks; and household perceptions and expectations in relation to future livelihoods. Household involved in non-livestock activities were asked for some basic questions on scale and intensity of operation of such activities, sources of capital for such enterprises and main uses of earned income.

Key informant interviews

18 people with particular knowledge of pastoral livelihoods, livelihood dynamics and transition in the area

Purposive sampling of key knowledgeable informants including key elders in the Borana Dedha, NGOs staff, government officials and extension officers

Test patterns observed in key literature and policy discourse on the determinants and drivers of exit from pastoral livestock livelihoods and the rise of NPI in the study sites

Focus group discussions

60 (20 from each study site) people drawn from the household survey with knowledge on different livelihood pathways

Purposive sampling of household survey respondents with particular knowledge of key livelihoods issues including pastoralists, traders in livestock and livestock products, petty traders, labourers and people in formal employment

Test patterns and drivers of pastoral diversification into NPI by identifying (a) any significant deviation of the data; (b) key informants interpretation of the patterns and drivers of NPIs and consequences of observed changes; and (c) their perceptions of future drivers and patterns of NPI in the area

Analysis of previous studies from the region

Pastoral Risk Management Project; Little et al. 2001a, b

Secondary data from the region on similar livelihood diversification and NPI issues

Identify (a) key drivers and patterns of pastoral diversification into NPIs and (b) association between NPIs and pastoral livestock livelihoods