Skip to main content

Research, Policy and Practice

Table 3 Focus groups’ weighting of consumption coping strategies

From: Characterising food insecurity in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda using a consumption coping strategy index

Code

Strategy

‘Weight’ (perceived severity of food insecurity circumstances)

  

Agro-pastoral

Pastoral

1

Eat less preferred but less expensive foodsa

6

5

2

Borrow fooda

3

2

3

Beg for food from a friend or relative

3

5

4

Purchase food on credit

3

3

5

Gather wild food plants or hunt

6

5

6

Harvest immature crops

1

5

7

Provide labour in exchange for food

3

3

8

Provide labour for income to buy food instead of preparing own fields

6

3

9

Consume seed stock held for the next season

6

5

10

Slaughter livestock and preserve meat

1

5

11

Sell calves to buy food

1

2

12

Sell breeding cows to buy food

6

5

13

Sell other cattle types to buy food

1

2

14

Sell other livestock to buy food

1

2

15

Sell assets to buy food

6

5

16

Send household members to eat elsewhere

6

5

17

Send household members to beg/fend for themselves

6

5

18

Limit portion size at meal timesa

3

3

19

Restrict consumption of adults in order for small children to eata

3

3

20

Feed working members of HH at the expense of non-working members

1

2

21

Ration the money available and buy pre-cooked food

3

3

22

Reduce the number of meals eaten in a daya

3

3

23

Skip entire days without eating

6

5

24

Barter (exchange an item for food)

6

5

25

Send children out to labour and earn to buy food

6

5

26

Send girl children for early marriage

6

5

27

Reduce the number of people in the household, e.g. send to a relative

6

5

  1. The maximum possible weight was 6 for agro-pastoralists and 5 for pastoralists; the minimum weight was 1 and 2, respectively (details in Table 2). aCore behaviours broadly comparable across contexts