Skip to main content

Research, Policy and Practice

Table 4 nutritional aspects of the fodder tree leaves and shrubs available in the study area

From: Indigenous fodder trees can increase grazing accessibility for landless and mobile pastoralists in northern Pakistan

Fodder plant

DM [%]

CP [%]

IVDMD [%]

PIR [gm/4 min]

± SE*

Trees

Ailanthus chinensis

26.7

15.2

63.2

37.0

± 3.42 b

Zizyphus jujube

23.4

17.8

63.2

71.2

±14.21a

Melia azedarach

21.7

12.8

62.6

36.3

± 2.63 b

Grewia oppositifolia

27.3

19.9

62.2

72.8

± 16.35a

Corylus avellana

22.6

20.7

61.3

69.5

± 14.57a

Aesculus indica

28.6

18.7

60.6

67.8

± 15.12a

Diospyros lotus

29.4

14.2

57.5

68.3

± 15.62a

Acacia modesta

23.4

17.5

55.9

41.4

±7.23 b

Betula utilis

28.2

19.7

54.4

70.8

± 12.17a

Morus nigra

27.2

14.6

54.4

69.4

±8.23 a

Acacia nilotica

22.7

18.1

54.3

43.5

±8.44 b

Ficus sarmentosa

33.4

12.4

54.3

45.5

± 4.94 b

Salix tetrasperma

24.8

17.4

52.7

39.8

±7.62 b

Robinia pseudoacacia

23.7

11.9

52.7

40.3

± 8.61 b

Morus alba

26.5

14.8

52.3

72.3

± 11.4a

Celtis australis

23.7

10.7

49.3

69.8

± 7.66a

Olea cuspidate

36.4

11.6

46.4

38.8

± 10.76 b

Celtis caucasica

32.2

10.1

46.3

67.5

± 20.87a

Quercus incana

37.4

11.9

42.4

18.3

± 2.36c

Quercus dilatata

38.6

12.0

41.9

13.2

±1.92 d

Shrubs

Impatiens bicolor

38.1

15.6

69.7

34.0

± 6.68c

Cotoneaster nummularia

36.4

19.8

63.2

70.9

±11.39 a

Anisomeles indica

28.4

19.8

61.2

57.5

± 8.87ab

Debregeasia salicifolia

33.6

18.0

58.2

67.5

± 11.00a

Indigofera gerardiana

38.1

16.6

57.8

67.5

± 15.95a

Myrsine africana

36.2

23.7

57.1

53.0

± 8.47bc

Indigofera heterantha

37.2

17.3

55.9

64.3

±9.14 a

Dodonaea viscosa

22.2

17.3

41.9

13.5

± 2.25d

Artemisia maritima

31.4

13.6

41.9

16.5

±2.31 d

  1. * Each figure represents the mean (± standard error) of four samples. Subscript letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).